Difference between revisions of "User talk:Aziraphale/Arbitration"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Aziraphale (talk | contribs) |
(→Primary: mea culpa) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
It looks as if one of the parties isn't going to show. Pity. [[User Talk:Samwell|Samwell]] 13:29, 7 September 2007 (EDT) | It looks as if one of the parties isn't going to show. Pity. [[User Talk:Samwell|Samwell]] 13:29, 7 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
:Hey now, everyone's internet usage is different. Conservative posted what he may have seen as a succinct summation of his argument ~17 hours ago; he hasn't made ''any'' edits in ~15 hours. I appreciate useful commentary, but the whole point of this arbitration is to drain the emotion '''out''' of the process. Please try to edit yourself before sniping. [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 13:54, 7 September 2007 (EDT) ''<-that's a request for this page, not life advice :D'' | :Hey now, everyone's internet usage is different. Conservative posted what he may have seen as a succinct summation of his argument ~17 hours ago; he hasn't made ''any'' edits in ~15 hours. I appreciate useful commentary, but the whole point of this arbitration is to drain the emotion '''out''' of the process. Please try to edit yourself before sniping. [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 13:54, 7 September 2007 (EDT) ''<-that's a request for this page, not life advice :D'' | ||
| + | ::You are absolutely correct...I totally missed that. Might I then suggest you format a "side-by-side" section so everyone can see what and where disagreement(s) arise. [[User Talk:Samwell|Samwell]] 14:08, 7 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:08, September 7, 2007
Others?
Is this open to others to offer comments, or is it by it's nature of being a dispute or for whatever reason limited to Conservative and Ungtss? Philip J. Rayment 11:19, 7 September 2007 (EDT)
- I'd love to open it up to other opinions, if Aziraphale + Conservative are okay with that. Ungtss 11:31, 7 September 2007 (EDT)
- Hi Philip,
- Well, first of all, I don't think there are any established rules at CP for this process. Perhaps we'll set some precedent but at the moment I'm just using my best judgment.
- I welcome the opinions of others, and yours in particular. :) That said, I'm fearful of two things: scope creep and drawing out the process. So please, yes, comments are welcome. I hope to put this to bed by Monday, Tuesday at the latest and, (not being a sysop, I'm trying to keep my focus on resolving the communication issues between Ungtss and Conservative and providing Andy with my best recommendation. Aziraphale 11:41, 7 September 2007 (EDT)
Primary
It looks as if one of the parties isn't going to show. Pity. Samwell 13:29, 7 September 2007 (EDT)
- Hey now, everyone's internet usage is different. Conservative posted what he may have seen as a succinct summation of his argument ~17 hours ago; he hasn't made any edits in ~15 hours. I appreciate useful commentary, but the whole point of this arbitration is to drain the emotion out of the process. Please try to edit yourself before sniping. Aziraphale 13:54, 7 September 2007 (EDT) <-that's a request for this page, not life advice :D
- You are absolutely correct...I totally missed that. Might I then suggest you format a "side-by-side" section so everyone can see what and where disagreement(s) arise. Samwell 14:08, 7 September 2007 (EDT)