Difference between revisions of "User talk:Aziraphale/Arbitration"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Primary: mea culpa) |
Aziraphale (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:Hey now, everyone's internet usage is different. Conservative posted what he may have seen as a succinct summation of his argument ~17 hours ago; he hasn't made ''any'' edits in ~15 hours. I appreciate useful commentary, but the whole point of this arbitration is to drain the emotion '''out''' of the process. Please try to edit yourself before sniping. [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 13:54, 7 September 2007 (EDT) ''<-that's a request for this page, not life advice :D'' | :Hey now, everyone's internet usage is different. Conservative posted what he may have seen as a succinct summation of his argument ~17 hours ago; he hasn't made ''any'' edits in ~15 hours. I appreciate useful commentary, but the whole point of this arbitration is to drain the emotion '''out''' of the process. Please try to edit yourself before sniping. [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 13:54, 7 September 2007 (EDT) ''<-that's a request for this page, not life advice :D'' | ||
::You are absolutely correct...I totally missed that. Might I then suggest you format a "side-by-side" section so everyone can see what and where disagreement(s) arise. [[User Talk:Samwell|Samwell]] 14:08, 7 September 2007 (EDT) | ::You are absolutely correct...I totally missed that. Might I then suggest you format a "side-by-side" section so everyone can see what and where disagreement(s) arise. [[User Talk:Samwell|Samwell]] 14:08, 7 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | :::No worries, Samwell. As for the formatting, if I can figure out how to wikify what you're describing I'll do so. In the meantime, the topics and subtopics hopefully will help keep thoughts on particular subjects discreet from each other. [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 14:23, 7 September 2007 (EDT) ''<-Az also springs eternal...'' | ||
Revision as of 18:23, September 7, 2007
Others?
Is this open to others to offer comments, or is it by it's nature of being a dispute or for whatever reason limited to Conservative and Ungtss? Philip J. Rayment 11:19, 7 September 2007 (EDT)
- I'd love to open it up to other opinions, if Aziraphale + Conservative are okay with that. Ungtss 11:31, 7 September 2007 (EDT)
- Hi Philip,
- Well, first of all, I don't think there are any established rules at CP for this process. Perhaps we'll set some precedent but at the moment I'm just using my best judgment.
- I welcome the opinions of others, and yours in particular. :) That said, I'm fearful of two things: scope creep and drawing out the process. So please, yes, comments are welcome. I hope to put this to bed by Monday, Tuesday at the latest and, (not being a sysop, I'm trying to keep my focus on resolving the communication issues between Ungtss and Conservative and providing Andy with my best recommendation. Aziraphale 11:41, 7 September 2007 (EDT)
Primary
It looks as if one of the parties isn't going to show. Pity. Samwell 13:29, 7 September 2007 (EDT)
- Hey now, everyone's internet usage is different. Conservative posted what he may have seen as a succinct summation of his argument ~17 hours ago; he hasn't made any edits in ~15 hours. I appreciate useful commentary, but the whole point of this arbitration is to drain the emotion out of the process. Please try to edit yourself before sniping. Aziraphale 13:54, 7 September 2007 (EDT) <-that's a request for this page, not life advice :D
- You are absolutely correct...I totally missed that. Might I then suggest you format a "side-by-side" section so everyone can see what and where disagreement(s) arise. Samwell 14:08, 7 September 2007 (EDT)
- No worries, Samwell. As for the formatting, if I can figure out how to wikify what you're describing I'll do so. In the meantime, the topics and subtopics hopefully will help keep thoughts on particular subjects discreet from each other. Aziraphale 14:23, 7 September 2007 (EDT) <-Az also springs eternal...
- You are absolutely correct...I totally missed that. Might I then suggest you format a "side-by-side" section so everyone can see what and where disagreement(s) arise. Samwell 14:08, 7 September 2007 (EDT)