nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 6:
Line 6: − + Line 22:
Line 22: + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Talk:Political Profiling (view source)
Revision as of 19:25, September 8, 2007
, 19:25, September 8, 2007Talk:Political profiling moved to Talk:Political Profiling
:Are you alleging Andy has cyberstalked, harrassed, and publicly defamed an individual with guilt by association smears, alleging someone holds partisan, extreme, or racist views that the person in reality does not? [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:16, 10 June 2007 (EDT)
:Are you alleging Andy has cyberstalked, harrassed, and publicly defamed an individual with guilt by association smears, alleging someone holds partisan, extreme, or racist views that the person in reality does not? [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:16, 10 June 2007 (EDT)
::I make no allegation about Andy cyberstalking. I just have trouble understanding your article. Either it is a bit obscure, or I am dense, or both.[[User:Associate|Associate]] 11:09, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
==More evidence==
==More evidence==
*Theis article was create on March 16 2007,[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Christian_terrorism&diff=83432&oldid=42538] [[Christian terrorism]], extracted,
*Theis article was create on March 16 2007,[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Christian_terrorism&diff=83432&oldid=42538] [[Christian terrorism]], extracted,
*Also, the linking of certain off-color articles and topics, through Google search, is yet another form of poisoning the well.--[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 00:24, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
*Also, the linking of certain off-color articles and topics, through Google search, is yet another form of poisoning the well.--[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 00:24, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
::Im not sure what point Rob is making about Christian Identity, but they are self-avowedly racist. They certainly consider themselves Christian, although it would be easy to argue that their beliefs have little to do with Jesus.[[User:Associate|Associate]] 01:45, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
::Im not sure what point Rob is making about Christian Identity, but they are self-avowedly racist. They certainly consider themselves Christian, although it would be easy to argue that their beliefs have little to do with Jesus.[[User:Associate|Associate]] 01:45, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
:::Throughout history, there are countless men and women who have called themselves Christians, but their actions state otherwise. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 01:49, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
::::The point being made is, the sourcing on this material is cited to [[Chip Berlet]] and [[Political Research Associates]] (PRA)-- the source of many if not most of the defamations cited in this article against specific person and organizations. As to the merits of Christian Identity, I do not intend to discuss it, however, it ''is'' patrently obvious within Wikipedia that Berlet & PRA's intention is to link Rev. Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, Dr. James Dobson, and D. James Kennedy to racism, Christian Identity, Christian Fascism, or whatever other defamation are effective. Review this for example from WP regareding Dr. Dobson's [[Family Research Council]],
::::*''The Southern Poverty Law Center has linked the Family Research Council to racism'' [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_Research_Council#Racism_allegations]
::::This '''classic''' language of Mr. Chip Berlet. Laird Wilcox's chapter in Berlet in ''The Watchdogs'', is entitled, ''Chip Berlet and Political Research Associates, A Sutdy in Links and Ties'', pgs. 114 - 131, the link is available at my user page, User:RobS, is RW. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 11:35, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
== Summary ==
If you could, read this and let me know if I have it right. Thanks.
So, certain organizations follow the edits of particular individuals on line and record them and establish a pattern. They then use the pattern of that individual's posts to profile them into a certain category, say, neonazi, etc. If the person's edits don't add up to neonazi, they just call them one anyway, making the data collection moot. Or, if they ''do'' add up to neo-nazi,it's bad to tell others because it would smear them? Im just a little lost.[[User:Frederick|Frederick]] 10:58, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
==Thank you==
to whoever unlocked the talk page. I agree with many of the comments above, at least the ones i understand. Could someone, like the author, explain this article in simple terms?[[User:Massimo|Massimo]] 15:55, 13 June 2007 (EDT)
:What's your question. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:20, 13 June 2007 (EDT)