Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sodom"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (wikification?) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
::::::Nice work there RW2![[User:Cracker|Cracker]][[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]] 12:41, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | ::::::Nice work there RW2![[User:Cracker|Cracker]][[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]] 12:41, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==="wikification?=== | ||
| + | At some point we're going to have to wikify this (as well as other articles on Conservapedia). By this I mean the process of adding the <nowiki>[[links]]</nowiki> that will enable browsers to skip through all of Conservapedia's othe articles. One of the things I liked about [[wikipedia]] was the ability of going from link to link to link, meandering through the articles. Something should ought to be set-up, a template perhaps(?), to alert editors that articles need to be linked. [[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 14:08, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:08, March 12, 2007
This article is vastly opinionated.--Elamdri 03:04, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
- It's an open encyclopedia. fix it then. RightWolf2 03:07, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
- I feel that the changes are much more appropriate. They still advance the site's agenda without being blatantly hateful.--Elamdri 03:22, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
- The Bible is not hate speech. I know the mass media and militant homosexual rights movement have intimidated most Believers into thinking so. I do tone things down and frame them properly, given time. RightWolf2 03:32, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
- I have a rather long piece cued up. I'll post it in 5 minutes if I don't hear back on this. You can always revert it anyway.Crackertalk 03:38, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
- I do not believe that the Bible is hate speech. However, I also do not trust the Bible to give non-biased depictions of events as it was written by men, divinely inspired they may be, but at the end of the day, still men.--Elamdri 03:47, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
- Needs some additions. Particularly the fact that God explicitly stated they were destroyed for sodomy. Sodomy is explicitly defined in other passages as homosexual behavior. :-) RightWolf2 03:59, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
"wikification?
At some point we're going to have to wikify this (as well as other articles on Conservapedia). By this I mean the process of adding the [[links]] that will enable browsers to skip through all of Conservapedia's othe articles. One of the things I liked about wikipedia was the ability of going from link to link to link, meandering through the articles. Something should ought to be set-up, a template perhaps(?), to alert editors that articles need to be linked. Crackertalk 14:08, 12 March 2007 (EDT)