Difference between revisions of "Talk:Homosexuality and Genetics"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Perhaps) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Perhaps there should be a controversy template on this? (To let people know they '''should'' ought to discuss edits first?) [[User Talk:Samwell|Samwell]] 00:35, 10 September 2007 (EDT) | Perhaps there should be a controversy template on this? (To let people know they '''should'' ought to discuss edits first?) [[User Talk:Samwell|Samwell]] 00:35, 10 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I'm not really sure what the view on this would be. Generally, the desire is to make articles as easy to read as possible, and putting up signs on controversial topics would hamper that smooth reading environment. It is generally left to the editor to recognize that some subjects are controversial (obvious) and that a number of editors over time have created the article as it exists, and discussing changes first is preferred. Some of the changes recently inserted would certainly never stick. For instance the twin research is not favorable to any belief in a strictly genetic cause. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 00:43, 10 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 04:43, September 10, 2007
Perhaps there should be a controversy template on this? (To let people know they 'should ought to discuss edits first?) Samwell 00:35, 10 September 2007 (EDT)
- I'm not really sure what the view on this would be. Generally, the desire is to make articles as easy to read as possible, and putting up signs on controversial topics would hamper that smooth reading environment. It is generally left to the editor to recognize that some subjects are controversial (obvious) and that a number of editors over time have created the article as it exists, and discussing changes first is preferred. Some of the changes recently inserted would certainly never stick. For instance the twin research is not favorable to any belief in a strictly genetic cause. Learn together 00:43, 10 September 2007 (EDT)