Difference between revisions of "Talk:Conservative links"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Evolution) |
(Other Thoughts for inclusion) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
This is an awesome page. Thanks for all the work on it, guys. I was wondering why Evolution is listed under Sexuality, though. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:58, 6 September 2007 (EDT) | This is an awesome page. Thanks for all the work on it, guys. I was wondering why Evolution is listed under Sexuality, though. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:58, 6 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Other Thoughts for inclusion == | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====Creation Study==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[http://www.answersingenesis.org/ Answers in Genesis] | ||
| + | *[http://www.icr.org/ Institute for Creation Research] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====Biblical History==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[http://www.tektonics.org Tektonics.Org] | ||
| + | *[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/index.html The Catholic Encyclopedia] | ||
Revision as of 18:51, September 10, 2007
Joaquín, thanks for creating this article. --Crocoite 10:22, 1 September 2007 (EDT)
Reorder in Alpha order?
It would be easier to follow the topics if they were in Alphabetical order. What do you think? --Crocoite 10:32, 1 September 2007 (EDT)
- Thank you for your comment. Please do whatever you think that could improve the article. --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 08:01, 2 September 2007 (EDT)
Locking?
Since you are now linking this article to dozens of others, I suggest it be locked...or maybe turned into a template? --şŷŝôρ-₮KṢρёаќǃ 22:36, 3 September 2007 (EDT)
Evolution
This is an awesome page. Thanks for all the work on it, guys. I was wondering why Evolution is listed under Sexuality, though. DanH 23:58, 6 September 2007 (EDT)