Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chrysler Building"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Changing voice from passive to active)
(The building is no less important because the article's author is verbotten.)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
A known frequent vandal created this [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk%3AMain_Page&diff=289733&oldid=289725 pathetic] article, and it should probably be removed.--[[User:Conservateur|Conservateur]] 13:14, 10 September 2007 (EDT)
 
A known frequent vandal created this [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk%3AMain_Page&diff=289733&oldid=289725 pathetic] article, and it should probably be removed.--[[User:Conservateur|Conservateur]] 13:14, 10 September 2007 (EDT)
 +
:Perhaps we could further expand on it instead? It '''is'' a landmark of the art deco style as alluded to in the article.[[User Talk:Samwell|Samwell]] 16:30, 10 September 2007 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 20:30, September 10, 2007

Good point Samwell, thank you.-RichardParker 22:38, 9 September 2007 (EDT)

I always think of pink/black "marbeline" when someone mentions art deco. Incidentally, in Hardware Wars, (the delightful Star Wars spoof trailer by Ernie Fosselius) one of the droids was named Artie Deco, (Obiwan Kenobi became Auggie ben Doggie). Samwell 22:45, 9 September 2007 (EDT)

A known frequent vandal created this pathetic article, and it should probably be removed.--Conservateur 13:14, 10 September 2007 (EDT)

Perhaps we could further expand on it instead? It 'is a landmark of the art deco style as alluded to in the article.Samwell 16:30, 10 September 2007 (EDT)