Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:General disclaimer"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Plagiarism) |
(→Plagiarism: huh, yeah. Now that you mention it...) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
This general disclaimer is largely plagiarized from Wikipedia's general disclaimer. That's not a good example to set; in college you get expelled for plagiarism. Luckily, solving the problem is as easy as crediting Wikipedia. Then all will be dandy. [[User:GOPfan77|GOPfan77]] 22:16, 8 September 2007 (EDT) | This general disclaimer is largely plagiarized from Wikipedia's general disclaimer. That's not a good example to set; in college you get expelled for plagiarism. Luckily, solving the problem is as easy as crediting Wikipedia. Then all will be dandy. [[User:GOPfan77|GOPfan77]] 22:16, 8 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Yeah, I just noticed this too. Isn't that a copyright violation? I mean, Wikipedia's GDFL requires attribution... [[User:MF|MF]] 22:37, 10 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 02:37, September 11, 2007
No Disclaimer?
I don't get it. If this site is, and I quote, "one of the largest and most reliable online educational resources of its kind", why does it have that "not-complete" feel to it. I thought it was just the articles at first... but this is a project page for heaven's sake!
I shall be back. O2mcgovem 19:21, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
- At the bottom of each page there is a link to Disclaimers. It links here to an empty page.
- At Conservapedia:Disclaimer one can find a discalimer. It includes the sentence:
- Nothing here has necessarily been reviewed or checked by anyone with expertise to ensure that it is accurate or reliable.
- I suggest that be inserted on this page. It could even be added to the bottom of every page.
- WhatIsG0ing0n 08:04, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
Plagiarism
This general disclaimer is largely plagiarized from Wikipedia's general disclaimer. That's not a good example to set; in college you get expelled for plagiarism. Luckily, solving the problem is as easy as crediting Wikipedia. Then all will be dandy. GOPfan77 22:16, 8 September 2007 (EDT)
- Yeah, I just noticed this too. Isn't that a copyright violation? I mean, Wikipedia's GDFL requires attribution... MF 22:37, 10 September 2007 (EDT)