Difference between revisions of "User talk:Romney4king"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
I didn't. Compare the two and you'll see that. All of the previous contributions are there, mnius grammar errors and POV stuff. Maybe you should read a little more before you jump to conclusions.... [[User:Romney4King|Romney4King]]
 
I didn't. Compare the two and you'll see that. All of the previous contributions are there, mnius grammar errors and POV stuff. Maybe you should read a little more before you jump to conclusions.... [[User:Romney4King|Romney4King]]
 +
 +
I don't have a problem with the article as it presently is. I just cleaned up some of the spelling. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 15:09, 12 March 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 19:09, March 12, 2007

I trust your sources, but you shouldn't rewrite the whole article because that takes away all the work that everybody before you has done. Instead, you should integrate them into the article or maybe add new paragraphs rather than deleting anything. MountainDew 15:06, 12 March 2007 (EDT)


I didn't. Compare the two and you'll see that. All of the previous contributions are there, mnius grammar errors and POV stuff. Maybe you should read a little more before you jump to conclusions.... Romney4King

I don't have a problem with the article as it presently is. I just cleaned up some of the spelling. MountainDew 15:09, 12 March 2007 (EDT)