Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gambit"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Gambits in chess are not limited to losing a pawn: In fact, in the 1909 world championships in Moscow, all-time great Tal won a decisive victory using a brilliant knight gambit. [[Overtur...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Gambits in chess are not limited to losing a pawn: In fact, in the 1909 world championships in Moscow, all-time great Tal won a decisive victory using a brilliant knight gambit. [[OverturnRoeWade]] | Gambits in chess are not limited to losing a pawn: In fact, in the 1909 world championships in Moscow, all-time great Tal won a decisive victory using a brilliant knight gambit. [[OverturnRoeWade]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | First, Tal wasn't born until 1936, so I'm not sure what game you were talking about, but I suspect you're talking about his Nf4 sacrifice in 1960. That would have been considered a sacrifice, not a gambit. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 12:34, 12 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:34, September 12, 2007
Gambits in chess are not limited to losing a pawn: In fact, in the 1909 world championships in Moscow, all-time great Tal won a decisive victory using a brilliant knight gambit. OverturnRoeWade
First, Tal wasn't born until 1936, so I'm not sure what game you were talking about, but I suspect you're talking about his Nf4 sacrifice in 1960. That would have been considered a sacrifice, not a gambit. DanH 12:34, 12 September 2007 (EDT)