Difference between revisions of "Talk:School"
Feebasfactor (talk | contribs) (References) |
m (New section to end) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | == My rewrite == | ||
| + | With no disrespect to the good edits of the previous editors, I felt that the changes were still not adequately describing the situation and that it couldn't be adequately described without a rearrangement. I hope people (still) like it now. Being not very familiar with the situations in other places, I've made some assumptions in the rewrite, so please jump in and correct what I've done. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:18, 17 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | There's no reference to prove that homeschooling is becoming more popular.--[[User:RogerMy|RogerMy]] 15:53, 18 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | :Then add a <nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:fact|fact]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki> tag, and wait for a bit. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''ηοξιμαχονγ''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|θαλκ]]</font></sup> 15:54, 18 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Obviously or this place would not exist.--[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 15:55, 18 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | :Erm... most of the edits are made by non-homeschoolers now, Will. And the citation is needed for the "an ''increasingly'' popular alternative"... who says it is becoming more popular? --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''ηοξιμαχονγ''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|θαλκ]]</font></sup> 15:59, 18 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
I apologize for the poor referencing last time. I hope these references prove to be more acceptable. However, I thought it might be wise to check first: | I apologize for the poor referencing last time. I hope these references prove to be more acceptable. However, I thought it might be wise to check first: | ||
| Line 7: | Line 16: | ||
Add the references to the article if you feel they're justified, or just say so and I'll add them myself. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 19:57, 14 September 2007 (EDT) | Add the references to the article if you feel they're justified, or just say so and I'll add them myself. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 19:57, 14 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 12:26, September 15, 2007
My rewrite
With no disrespect to the good edits of the previous editors, I felt that the changes were still not adequately describing the situation and that it couldn't be adequately described without a rearrangement. I hope people (still) like it now. Being not very familiar with the situations in other places, I've made some assumptions in the rewrite, so please jump in and correct what I've done. Philip J. Rayment 20:18, 17 June 2007 (EDT)
There's no reference to prove that homeschooling is becoming more popular.--RogerMy 15:53, 18 July 2007 (EDT)
- Then add a {{fact}} tag, and wait for a bit. --ηοξιμαχονγθαλκ 15:54, 18 July 2007 (EDT)
Obviously or this place would not exist.--Will N. 15:55, 18 July 2007 (EDT)
- Erm... most of the edits are made by non-homeschoolers now, Will. And the citation is needed for the "an increasingly popular alternative"... who says it is becoming more popular? --ηοξιμαχονγθαλκ 15:59, 18 July 2007 (EDT)
References
I apologize for the poor referencing last time. I hope these references prove to be more acceptable. However, I thought it might be wise to check first:
Reference for "citation needed" #1 ("increasingly popular alternative"): http://nces.ed.gov/nhes/homeschool/
Reference for "citation needed" #3 ("parents choose homeschooling due to..."): http://www.hsnp.com/gok/faq.html
Add the references to the article if you feel they're justified, or just say so and I'll add them myself. Feebasfactor 19:57, 14 September 2007 (EDT)