Changes

313 bytes added ,  02:09, September 16, 2007
no edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:  
*''[[Hunt v. Washington State Apple Adver. Comm'n]]''
 
*''[[Hunt v. Washington State Apple Adver. Comm'n]]''
 
*''[[Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife]]''
 
*''[[Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife]]''
 +
 +
Only one of the petitioners needs to have standing to permit the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] to consider the petition for review"
 +
 +
*''[[Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc.]]'', 547 U.S. 47, 52, n. 2, 126 S. Ct. 1297, 164 L. Ed. 2d 156 (2006).
    
In [[Establishment Clause]] cases, plaintiffs challenge religion in public life based on two separate types of standing:
 
In [[Establishment Clause]] cases, plaintiffs challenge religion in public life based on two separate types of standing:
Line 12: Line 16:  
[[Category:Establishment Clause]]
 
[[Category:Establishment Clause]]
 
[[Category:Constitution]]
 
[[Category:Constitution]]
 +
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,565

edits