Changes

[[Image:27 2blinka fig01f.jpg|thumb|150px|right|[[Simon Greenleaf]]]]

[[Image:27 2blinka fig01f.jpg|thumb|150px|right|[[Simon Greenleaf]]]]

Dr. '''Simon Greenleaf''' was one of the principal founders of the [[Harvard Law School]], a legal scholar, and also taught law at [[Harvard Law School]].<ref>http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/jesus/greenleaf.html</ref>  In addition, Greenleaf was the author of the classic three-volume text, ''A Treatise on the Law

Dr. '''Simon Greenleaf''' was one of the principal founders of the [[Harvard Law School]], a legal scholar, and also served asa [[Isaac Royall, Jr.|Royall]] Professor at [[Harvard Law School]].<ref>http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/jesus/greenleaf.html</ref>  In addition, Greenleaf was the author of the classic three-volume text, ''A Treatise on the Law

of Evidence'' (1842) and according to Dr. Wilbur Smith this work "is still considered the greatest single authority on evidence in the entire literature on legal procedure.” <ref>http://www.johnankerberg.org/Articles/ATRJ/truth/ATRJ1203-EVPDF/ATRJ1203-EV-3.pdf</ref>  

of Evidence'' (1842) and according to Dr. Wilbur Smith this work "is still considered the greatest single authority on evidence in the entire literature on legal procedure.” <ref>http://www.johnankerberg.org/Articles/ATRJ/truth/ATRJ1203-EVPDF/ATRJ1203-EV-3.pdf</ref><ref>http://www.bible.org/page.php?page_id=551</ref>  

In his law classes Dr. Greenleaf, who was an [[atheism|atheist]] at the time, would frequently attack the [[Bible]] until some of his Christian students challenged him to take his textbook and apply it to the Bible and to the [[Resurrection of Jesus Christ]].<ref>http://www.apprising.org/archives/2006/09/thy_word_is_tru_1.html</ref><ref>http://www.allaboutthejourney.org/the-case-for-christ.htm</ref> Dr. Greenleaf accepted his students challenge and when he examined the evidence for the resurrection of Christ he became a Christian.<ref>http://www.allaboutthejourney.org/the-case-for-christ.htm</ref> Dr. Greenleaf is often cited in the field of [[Christian Legal Apologetics|Christian legal apologetics]]. In his essay the ''[[Testimony of the Evangelists Examined by the Rules of Evidence Administered in Courts of Justice]]'', Greenleaf wrote the following:  

In his law classes Dr. Greenleaf, who was an [[atheism|atheist]] at the time, would frequently attack the [[Bible]] until some of his Christian students challenged him to take his textbook and apply it to the Bible and to the [[Resurrection of Jesus Christ]].<ref>http://www.apprising.org/archives/2006/09/thy_word_is_tru_1.html</ref><ref>http://www.allaboutthejourney.org/the-case-for-christ.htm</ref> Dr. Greenleaf accepted his students challenge and when he examined the evidence for the resurrection of Christ he became a Christian.<ref>http://www.allaboutthejourney.org/the-case-for-christ.htm</ref> Dr. Greenleaf is often cited in the field of [[Christian Legal Apologetics|Christian legal apologetics]]. In his essay the ''[[Testimony of the Evangelists Examined by the Rules of Evidence Administered in Courts of Justice]]'', Greenleaf wrote the following:  

{{cquote|All that Christianity asks of men…is, that they would be consistent with themselves; that they would treat its evidences as they treat the evidence of other things; and that they would try and judge its actors and witnesses, as they deal with their fellow men, when testifying to human affairs and actions, in human tribunals. Let the witnesses [to the Resurrection] be compared with themselves, with each other, and with surrounding facts and circumstances; and let their testimony be sifted, as if it were given in a court of justice, on the side of the adverse party, the witness being subjected to a rigorous cross-examination. The result, it is confidently believed, will be an undoubting conviction of their integrity, ability and truth.<ref>http://www.bibleteacher.org/sgtestimony.htm</ref>}}

{{cquote|All that Christianity asks of men…is, that they would be consistent with themselves; that they would treat its evidences as they treat the evidence of other things; and that they would try and judge its actors and witnesses, as they deal with their fellow men, when testifying to human affairs and actions, in human tribunals. Let the witnesses [to the Resurrection] be compared with themselves, with each other, and with surrounding facts and circumstances; and let their testimony be sifted, as if it were given in a court of justice, on the side of the adverse party, the witness being subjected to a rigorous cross-examination. The result, it is confidently believed, will be an undoubting conviction of their integrity, ability and truth.<ref>http://www.bibleteacher.org/sgtestimony.htm</ref>}}

==References==

==References==

{{reflist|2}}

{{reflist|2}}