Difference between revisions of "The God Delusion"

Revision as of 22:45, September 22, 2007

The God Delusion is a book by prominent atheist Richard Dawkins. Dawkins' website describes it:

"A preeminent scientist – and the world's most prominent atheist – asserts the irrationality of belief in God and the grievous harm religion has inflicted on society, from the Crusades to 9/11."

The God Delusion, by Richard Dawkins was written to attempt to prosuade religious people to "de"-convert from their religions to atheism.

Intentions

In his book, Dawkins' main objectives are to convince his readers that the existence of God or any other deity is highly unlikely, the Bible is incoherent, morality does not come from religion, and that if religion does effect morality, it only makes people worse. He also intends to teach that atheists can live happy, intelligent, lives (perhaps even happier lives than religious people). It asserts that atheists do not do evil things in the name of atheism, while religious people have been known to commit atrocities in the name of their religion.

Criticism

The God Delusion has been subject to a great deal of criticisms from the religious and the non-religious alike.

Andrew Brown: Prospect Magazine

"It has been obvious for years that Richard Dawkins had a fat book on religion in him, but who would have thought him capable of writing one this bad? Incurious, dogmatic, rambling and self-contradictory, it has none of the style or verve of his earlier works."^[1]

Andrew Brown of Prospect Magazine was unimpressed by Dawkins' book. Brown calls atheism "unnatural" and points out that many atheists were violent in their belief (or lack thereof), citing Stalin killing members of the clergy.

Brown also attacks Dawkins' argument that suicide bombers are caused by religious schools. While Dawkins states that if these children were not taught what he calls "faith without question", suicide bombings would not be an issue. Brown, however, says that religion is not a necessity in suicide bombings. He points out that it is a tactic used by Marxists in Sri Lankav.

Marilynne Robinson: Harper's Magazine

"There is a pervasive exclusion of historical memory in Dawkins's view of science. Consider this sentence from his preface, which occurs in the context of his vision of a religion-free world: 'Imagine . . . no persecution of Jews as 'Christ-killers.'"^[2]

Robinson's major complaints about The God Delusion lie in how sheerly false the book is in many aspects. Although Dawkins claims that "the majority of us believe in free speech", she points out that most countries do not, pointing out that China (population 1.3 billion^[3]) does not. In her review, Robinson basically says that Dawkins purposefully ignored important parts of history in his attempt to convince his readers. "It's a shame," she says, "to see him reduced to one long argument from professorial incredulity."

Terry Eagleton: London Review of Books

"Card-carrying rationalists like Dawkins [...] are in one sense the least well-equipped to understand what they castigate, since they don’t believe there is anything there to be understood, or at least anything worth understanding."

Alister McGrath: The Dawkins Delusion?

The Dawkins Delusion? is a response to Dawkins' The God Delusion.

Sources

www.richarddawkins.net

The God Delusion, by Richard Dawkins

[1] ttp://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/article_details.php?id=7803

[2] ttp://solutions.synearth.net/2006/10/20

[3] ttp://geography.about.com/od/populationgeography/a/chinapopulation.htm

[1]

[2]

[3]

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 <blockquote>"A preeminent scientist – and the world's most prominent atheist – asserts the irrationality of belief in God and the grievous harm religion has inflicted on society, from the Crusades to 9/11."</blockquote>
-''The God Delusion'', by [[Richard Dawkins]] was written to persuade religious people to "de"-convert from their relgions to atheism, and to strengthen the convictions of any atheists who may also read it.  It has been a ''New York Times'' bestseller for nearly a year.
+''The God Delusion'', by [[Richard Dawkins]] was written to attempt to prosuade religious people to "de"-convert from their religions to atheism.
-==Brief Summary==
-===Chapter 1===
-In chapter 1, Dawkins attempts to establish Einstein as nonreligious, and he tries to prove that religion is unworthy of respect.
-===Chapter 2===
-In chapter 2, Dawkins explains the different kinds of religion (Monotheism, Polytheism).  He also asserts that the founding fathers of the USA were nonreligious.  He continues to explain Secularism, Agnosticism, and some basic assertions of the religious.
-===Chapter 3===
-In chapter 3, Dawkins summarizes some common proofs for God and attempts to debunk them.
-===Chapter 4===
-In chapter 4, Dawkins gives his reasons for believing that God is about as likely as fairies living under his garden.
-===Chapter 5===
-In chapter 5, Dawkins gives and explains some thoughts about the origins of religion that have been proposed by atheists.
-===Chapter 6===
-In chapter 6, Dawkins explains why he believes that morality evolved.
-===Chapter 7===
-In chapter 7, Dawkins suggests that morality does not come from religion, but rather a changing [[Moral Zeitgeist]].
-===Chapter 8===
-In chapter 8, Dawkins shows why he believes that religion is evil and repressive.
-===Chapter 9===
-In chapter 9, Dawkins explains why he believes that religion is child abuse, and that the scars from the "indoctrination" last into adulthood and even the child's entire life.
-===Chapter 10===
-In chapter 10, Dawkins concludes his book on a more positive level, giving inspiration to those whom he may have convinced to "de"-convert from their religion.
 ==Intentions==
@@ Line 63: / Line 32: @@
 ===Alister McGrath:  The Dawkins Delusion?===
 ''The Dawkins Delusion?'' is a response to Dawkins' ''The God Delusion''.
-== Quotes from ''The God Delusion'' ==
-"The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction:  jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully."  Chapter 2
-"I am one of an increasing number of biologists who see religion as a ''by-product'' of something else."  Chapter 5
-"By contrast, what I, as a scientist, believe (for example, [[evolution]]) I believe not because of reading a holy book but because I have studied the evidence... Books about evolution are believed because they present overwhelming quantities of mutually buttressed evidence."  Chapter 8
-"... [Moral absolutism] rules the minds of a great number of people in the world today, most dangeriously so in the Muslim world and in the incipient American theocracy... Such absolutism nearly always results from strong religious faith, and it constitutes a major reason for suggesting that religion can be a force for evil in the world."  Chapter 8
 == Sources ==