Difference between revisions of "User talk:SayaSan"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(thanks) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Does this mean that using tear gas and baton charges against civilians is ''always'' evil? (Note: not trying to create a new thread, just asking for clarification before I reply on talk main page or on the debate page). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:39, 26 September 2007 (EDT) | Does this mean that using tear gas and baton charges against civilians is ''always'' evil? (Note: not trying to create a new thread, just asking for clarification before I reply on talk main page or on the debate page). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:39, 26 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
: I'm tempted to rule this one out under teh [[Categorical Imperative]], but that's always tricky. They certainly are wrong against peaceful protesters, and there's no question that they are wrong here. --[[User:SayaSan|SayaSan]] | : I'm tempted to rule this one out under teh [[Categorical Imperative]], but that's always tricky. They certainly are wrong against peaceful protesters, and there's no question that they are wrong here. --[[User:SayaSan|SayaSan]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Thanks for the clarification. I will respond in the proper place. :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:43, 26 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:43, September 26, 2007
*pulls block lever*
Gah, I keep forgetting! --transResident Transfanform!
- You are welcome, if you can help me undo my accidental conservative bias.
- So far, most of what I've seen is emotionalism, calls for banning, etc. Can we make concrete suggestions?
- Do we need a unprotected page for Protest in Myanmar? --Ed Poor Talk 15:38, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
- Sounds like a good idea. Maestro 15:50, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
You wrote:
- These police have already attacked the monks for peaceful protest. They've already used tear gas, and baton charges against people who were peacefully protesting.
Does this mean that using tear gas and baton charges against civilians is always evil? (Note: not trying to create a new thread, just asking for clarification before I reply on talk main page or on the debate page). --Ed Poor Talk 16:39, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
- I'm tempted to rule this one out under teh Categorical Imperative, but that's always tricky. They certainly are wrong against peaceful protesters, and there's no question that they are wrong here. --SayaSan