Difference between revisions of "Talk:Black church-burning hoax"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: Shall we mention which ''liberal'' group was responsible for the hoax, or is the L word enough? Should we even mention what the hoax was, or is it sufficient to say 'it was a liberal hoax...)
 
(2 ref's for Maestro to follow up on)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Shall we mention which ''liberal'' group was responsible for the hoax, or is the L word enough?  Should we even mention what the hoax was, or is it sufficient to say 'it was a liberal hoax'? [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 16:53, 27 September 2007 (EDT)
 
Shall we mention which ''liberal'' group was responsible for the hoax, or is the L word enough?  Should we even mention what the hoax was, or is it sufficient to say 'it was a liberal hoax'? [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 16:53, 27 September 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Yes to both. Please do this. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:56, 27 September 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 20:56, September 27, 2007

Shall we mention which liberal group was responsible for the hoax, or is the L word enough? Should we even mention what the hoax was, or is it sufficient to say 'it was a liberal hoax'? Maestro 16:53, 27 September 2007 (EDT)

Yes to both. Please do this. --Ed Poor Talk 16:56, 27 September 2007 (EDT)