Difference between revisions of "Talk:Black church-burning hoax"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(yes do name them) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::I hadn't heard about this before. I'll look forward to the final entry! [[User:Graham|Graham]] 16:59, 27 September 2007 (EDT) | ::I hadn't heard about this before. I'll look forward to the final entry! [[User:Graham|Graham]] 16:59, 27 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : We should say which group, by name, and back it up with references. If it's the group I'm thinking of they also deserve a Conservapedia article about them - a sleazy multimillion dollar fundraising outfit pretending to be a "civil rights" group. [[User:Parrothead|Parrothead]] 17:06, 27 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:06, September 27, 2007
Shall we mention which liberal group was responsible for the hoax, or is the L word enough? Should we even mention what the hoax was, or is it sufficient to say 'it was a liberal hoax'? Maestro 16:53, 27 September 2007 (EDT)
- I hadn't heard about this before. I'll look forward to the final entry! Graham 16:59, 27 September 2007 (EDT)
- We should say which group, by name, and back it up with references. If it's the group I'm thinking of they also deserve a Conservapedia article about them - a sleazy multimillion dollar fundraising outfit pretending to be a "civil rights" group. Parrothead 17:06, 27 September 2007 (EDT)