Difference between revisions of "Talk:Joseph McCarthy"
(fixed my sig) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Although the wikipedia article continues to smear and blacken the name of this great American, I was able to use some of it as a base to flesh out this article to provide some more detail about the great Senator. I hope you like it. – [[User:frijole|Fʀɪ<small>ɺ</small>øʟɛ]] <sub>( [[User_talk:Frijole|тɐʟк]] • [[Special:Contributions/Frijole|¢<small>ʘ</small>и†ʀ¡<small>β</small>s]] )</sub> 21:23, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | Although the wikipedia article continues to smear and blacken the name of this great American, I was able to use some of it as a base to flesh out this article to provide some more detail about the great Senator. I hope you like it. – [[User:frijole|Fʀɪ<small>ɺ</small>øʟɛ]] <sub>( [[User_talk:Frijole|тɐʟк]] • [[Special:Contributions/Frijole|¢<small>ʘ</small>и†ʀ¡<small>β</small>s]] )</sub> 21:23, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Well... I hate to go against the grain but the only reason why he's notable is because of the bad things that he did do. And this is the new century, do we really need to keep acting like communism is still the big bad enemy? Last time I checked most communist countries fell out of power, sans China, and democracy still reigns over most of the world. And are the flowery words really needed? Of course it's heroic, what kind of a liberal fool are you to have to be told as such? --[[User:Ronnyreg|Ronnyreg]] 21:52, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 01:52, March 13, 2007
This article is horrendously written. Truly. Would someone with some good sources tear it apart?--AmesG 23:03, 9 March 2007 (EST)
I'd take a look at it now, but I'm going to work soon. MountainDew 23:03, 9 March 2007 (EST)
It seems a shame to mention only the horrid propoganda about this true American hero. Maybe we can work out a compromise. ATB 12:30, 10 March 2007 (EST)
The latest version, although stripped down, is more respectful to this great man. ATB 14:07, 10 March 2007 (EST)
Although the wikipedia article continues to smear and blacken the name of this great American, I was able to use some of it as a base to flesh out this article to provide some more detail about the great Senator. I hope you like it. – Fʀɪɺøʟɛ ( тɐʟк • ¢ʘи†ʀ¡βs ) 21:23, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
Well... I hate to go against the grain but the only reason why he's notable is because of the bad things that he did do. And this is the new century, do we really need to keep acting like communism is still the big bad enemy? Last time I checked most communist countries fell out of power, sans China, and democracy still reigns over most of the world. And are the flowery words really needed? Of course it's heroic, what kind of a liberal fool are you to have to be told as such? --Ronnyreg 21:52, 12 March 2007 (EDT)