Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 295:
Line 295: − Do you have a cite for that 95% thing? Or is this just more of lumping one ideological group together with anything that conceivably shares one ideological tenet with it? Because it seems unsupported. You know, I heard that 95% of conservatives support preemptively imprisoning all American Muslims - a little 2007-era ''[[Korematsu]]''! What, you don't believe it? Disprove me! You'd be hard-pressed to find a counterexample!-[[User:Carlon|Carlon]] 00:02, 1 October 2007 (EDT)+
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 04:05, October 1, 2007
, 04:05, October 1, 2007Reverted edits by Carlon (Talk); changed back to last version by Archibald
::::::: At least 95% of [[liberals]] support taxpayer-funded [[abortion]] and censorship of [[prayer]] in [[public school]]. You'd be hard-pressed to identify counterexamples. It's a [[deceit]] to describe what a [[liberal]] is and to leave that out, as [[Wikipedia]] does.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:58, 30 September 2007 (EDT)
::::::: At least 95% of [[liberals]] support taxpayer-funded [[abortion]] and censorship of [[prayer]] in [[public school]]. You'd be hard-pressed to identify counterexamples. It's a [[deceit]] to describe what a [[liberal]] is and to leave that out, as [[Wikipedia]] does.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:58, 30 September 2007 (EDT)
== "Wikipedia allows the use of B.C.E. instead of B.C. and C.E. instead of A.D." ==
== "Wikipedia allows the use of B.C.E. instead of B.C. and C.E. instead of A.D." ==