Changes

500 bytes removed ,  15:58, October 3, 2007
m
Reverted edits by Jenkins (Talk); changed back to last version by Ajkgordon
Line 661: Line 661:     
:::::::The text as it now stands states that Conservapedia is supportive of a conservative view and many of the articles are supportive of a YEC view. Is this not correct? If it isn't, what form of words would be correct? [[User:Ajkgordon|Ajkgordon]] 11:50, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
 
:::::::The text as it now stands states that Conservapedia is supportive of a conservative view and many of the articles are supportive of a YEC view. Is this not correct? If it isn't, what form of words would be correct? [[User:Ajkgordon|Ajkgordon]] 11:50, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
−
  −
::::::::Wait, I think I can answer that. *channels his Inner Andy* "Conservapedia is neutral to the facts and does not accept a journalist's opinion as fact, especially not when it's so obviously biased. As such, Conservapedia supports the truth; unlike the liberal Wikipedia, which censors facts about the theory of evolution, the abortion industry, and the breast cancer risk that abortions bring. Godspeed." I hope I got it halfway right :) --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 11:56, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
 
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,506

edits