Difference between revisions of "ACLU v. Mercer County"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Anonymousss (talk | contribs) (Removing all content from page) |
m (Undo revision 310838 by Special:Contributions/Anonymousss (User talk:Anonymousss)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | The Eighth Circuit ruled in favor of a display of the Ten Commandments in '''ACLU v. Mercer County''' (2005) by declaring that the Constitution does not demand “a wall of separation between church and state.” | ||
| + | Judge Richard Suhrheinrich decried the [[ACLU]]’s “repeated references to the ‘separation of church and state,’” observing that “this extra-constitutional construct has grown tiresome.” Judge Alice Batchelder joined this decision. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:United States law]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Establishment Clause]] | ||
Revision as of 21:00, October 6, 2007
The Eighth Circuit ruled in favor of a display of the Ten Commandments in ACLU v. Mercer County (2005) by declaring that the Constitution does not demand “a wall of separation between church and state.”
Judge Richard Suhrheinrich decried the ACLU’s “repeated references to the ‘separation of church and state,’” observing that “this extra-constitutional construct has grown tiresome.” Judge Alice Batchelder joined this decision.