Difference between revisions of "User talk:The AC"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I can't ban you otherwise, I would have done so already. But instead of vandalizing Conservapedia, why not help edit it. That way you can voice your opinion in a constructive way that may even have some permanence. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 05:33, 13 March 2007 (EDT) | I can't ban you otherwise, I would have done so already. But instead of vandalizing Conservapedia, why not help edit it. That way you can voice your opinion in a constructive way that may even have some permanence. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 05:33, 13 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
:Thank you. And you're wrong about any attempt to remove bias being fixed. Most of the editing I've done and seen actually supports removing as much bias as possible. Nevertheless, thanks again for stopping the vandalizing. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 05:41, 13 March 2007 (EDT) | :Thank you. And you're wrong about any attempt to remove bias being fixed. Most of the editing I've done and seen actually supports removing as much bias as possible. Nevertheless, thanks again for stopping the vandalizing. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 05:41, 13 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | If this wasn't biased, it most definitely would not be called "Conservapedia". | ||
Revision as of 09:44, March 13, 2007
Very mature, The AC. You're really helping... ColinR 05:30, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
I can't ban you otherwise, I would have done so already. But instead of vandalizing Conservapedia, why not help edit it. That way you can voice your opinion in a constructive way that may even have some permanence. ColinR 05:33, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
- Thank you. And you're wrong about any attempt to remove bias being fixed. Most of the editing I've done and seen actually supports removing as much bias as possible. Nevertheless, thanks again for stopping the vandalizing. ColinR 05:41, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
If this wasn't biased, it most definitely would not be called "Conservapedia".