Difference between revisions of "Talk:God"
(→Note) |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
==Note== | ==Note== | ||
Excuse me, but is that really a fair assumption? I'm also pretty sure that Judaism is the source of both Islam and Christianity, but those two aren't actually connected to each other. But I could be wrong. Either way, it also seems to paint Islam in some sort of satanic light. They're just different and probably wrong, not evil.--[[User:Ronnyreg|Ronnyreg]] 22:45, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | Excuse me, but is that really a fair assumption? I'm also pretty sure that Judaism is the source of both Islam and Christianity, but those two aren't actually connected to each other. But I could be wrong. Either way, it also seems to paint Islam in some sort of satanic light. They're just different and probably wrong, not evil.--[[User:Ronnyreg|Ronnyreg]] 22:45, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Why has this article been locked?== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Why has this article been locked? So far as I know, it is not under attack, and so doesn't need protection. Is this yet another effort to prevent ideas other than those of Admin - even alternative ''Christian'' views - getting an airing? This is getting rather like the old Vatican! When are the trials for heresy going to begin? --[[User:Petrus|Petrus]] 06:22, 13 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 10:22, March 13, 2007
I think the "God" page of ALL pages should have just a LITTLE bit longer page --Elamdri 03:51, 12 March 2007 (EDT)--Elamdri
Fixed a vandal.--Elamdri 03:51, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
Neutrality
Made this page talk about God as a deistic being as well as the Christian PoV.MatteeNeutra 15:49, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
- Conservapedia is not about neutrality. Conservapedia favors factual information over "neutral" information, and is written from a Christian point of view. Thus, the article on God should accurately say that God is the creator of the universe, not "neutrally" imply the Christians invented God's status as the creator of the universe. --NVConservative 16:00, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
- Actually, nowhere in the Conservapedia Commandments does it mention a Christian PoV. In fact its called Conservapedia and I'm fairly confident that not all Conservatives are Christians. Your reversion to the old very biased page is very strange to me. MatteeNeutra 16:04, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
- As a sociologist, I challenge you to definitively explain the "objective" right and wrong. I would also ask you to support your argument that "Christianity is right" with at least one academic source. --TrueGrit 22:38, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
Many are skeptical of which idea?
"However, many are skeptical of this idea." -- The idea of it being the same god, or that it's a Muslim plot? NousEpirrhytos 18:42, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
Note
Excuse me, but is that really a fair assumption? I'm also pretty sure that Judaism is the source of both Islam and Christianity, but those two aren't actually connected to each other. But I could be wrong. Either way, it also seems to paint Islam in some sort of satanic light. They're just different and probably wrong, not evil.--Ronnyreg 22:45, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
Why has this article been locked?
Why has this article been locked? So far as I know, it is not under attack, and so doesn't need protection. Is this yet another effort to prevent ideas other than those of Admin - even alternative Christian views - getting an airing? This is getting rather like the old Vatican! When are the trials for heresy going to begin? --Petrus 06:22, 13 March 2007 (EDT)