Difference between revisions of "Talk:Secular humanism"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Here's a site that might be useful for cites. [http://www.secularhumanism.org/index.php?section=main&page=affirmations] :[[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 22:29, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | :Here's a site that might be useful for cites. [http://www.secularhumanism.org/index.php?section=main&page=affirmations] :[[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 22:29, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
::Even with these, we need to be careful to maintain that this organization does not represent ALL secular humanists. Also, I think the "anti-religion" assertion really needs some major support, as it's hard to define anti-religion (against all belief in supernatural? personally disbelieving but willing to accept others' beliefs? actively proselytizing against religion? believing that religion should be illegal?), and I think of secular humanists as being the segment of nontheism that emphasizes religion or lack thereof the least, aiming more towards social justice and such things. --[[User:John|John]] 22:42, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | ::Even with these, we need to be careful to maintain that this organization does not represent ALL secular humanists. Also, I think the "anti-religion" assertion really needs some major support, as it's hard to define anti-religion (against all belief in supernatural? personally disbelieving but willing to accept others' beliefs? actively proselytizing against religion? believing that religion should be illegal?), and I think of secular humanists as being the segment of nontheism that emphasizes religion or lack thereof the least, aiming more towards social justice and such things. --[[User:John|John]] 22:42, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ====Why the rv of 17:24, 13 March 2007 ==== | ||
| + | I didn't see how that edit was ''wrong''? [[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 17:26, 13 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:26, March 13, 2007
Very opinionated article.----John 22:42, 12 March 2007 (EDT)Elamdri 22:24, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
- Here's a site that might be useful for cites. [1] :Crackertalk 22:29, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
- Even with these, we need to be careful to maintain that this organization does not represent ALL secular humanists. Also, I think the "anti-religion" assertion really needs some major support, as it's hard to define anti-religion (against all belief in supernatural? personally disbelieving but willing to accept others' beliefs? actively proselytizing against religion? believing that religion should be illegal?), and I think of secular humanists as being the segment of nontheism that emphasizes religion or lack thereof the least, aiming more towards social justice and such things. --John 22:42, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
Why the rv of 17:24, 13 March 2007
I didn't see how that edit was wrong? Crackertalk 17:26, 13 March 2007 (EDT)