Difference between revisions of "Talk:Human reproduction"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(No, and no.)
m (Reverted edits by AngelOfMercy (Talk); changed back to last version by Afi)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
:Draft is [[/draft|here]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 16:14, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:Draft is [[/draft|here]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 16:14, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
−
:: Ed- Too many big words: "gametes",  "congress" (as in "sex"), "parthenogenesis".  Kids will never understand any of that and go read about it on Wikipedia. [[User:AngelOfMercy|AngelOfMercy]] 11:36, 3 November 2007 (EDT)
 
  
 
I note that X is also missing. This should be a priority I feel, as this could be a valuable source of information with integrity for vulnerable youth looking for answers. --[[User:stevendavy|stevendavy]] 16:23, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
 
I note that X is also missing. This should be a priority I feel, as this could be a valuable source of information with integrity for vulnerable youth looking for answers. --[[User:stevendavy|stevendavy]] 16:23, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
Line 10: Line 9:
  
 
I notice there is a distinct lack of reproductive organs in this wiki. I don't understand, surely conservatives can describe them in a clinical, objective manner without exploding with passion? There are conservative gynecologists, aren't there? --[[User:Afi|Afi]] 18:22, 17 July 2007 (EDT)
 
I notice there is a distinct lack of reproductive organs in this wiki. I don't understand, surely conservatives can describe them in a clinical, objective manner without exploding with passion? There are conservative gynecologists, aren't there? --[[User:Afi|Afi]] 18:22, 17 July 2007 (EDT)
−
: No, Afi.  This is an indoctrination wiki, used to scare young children into believing in the Christian God.  While reproduction is considered by certain sects of Christians to be a command (see the initial chapters of Genesis), talking or thinking about it is considered a sin (this part is dogma).  It's one of many interesting ironies, where you're not supposed to think about it, but you have to do it anyway (mindlessness makes great worshipers).  There's no room for clinical discussion, because they can learn that in med-school.  Their innocent minds should be reserved for "pure" thoughts and prayer. [[User:AngelOfMercy|AngelOfMercy]] 11:36, 3 November 2007 (EDT)
 

Revision as of 15:36, November 3, 2007

Blimey, this was an ommision. Requires expansion and illustration.

Let's work on this behind the scenes and try to come up with something suitable for all ages.
Draft is here. --Ed Poor 16:14, 21 April 2007 (EDT)

I note that X is also missing. This should be a priority I feel, as this could be a valuable source of information with integrity for vulnerable youth looking for answers. --stevendavy 16:23, 21 April 2007 (EDT)


I notice there is a distinct lack of reproductive organs in this wiki. I don't understand, surely conservatives can describe them in a clinical, objective manner without exploding with passion? There are conservative gynecologists, aren't there? --Afi 18:22, 17 July 2007 (EDT)

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Human_reproduction&oldid=327133"