Difference between revisions of "Talk:Intelligent Design (book)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Move?) |
(→Move?: Agree) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
As per the Manual of Style, the content of this article should be about [[intelligent design]] while the current content should move (for example) to <nowiki>[[Intelligent Design (book)]]</nowiki> - any sysop opinion on this? If the answer is no, then the article should at least have a line like "''This article is about the book called Intelligent Design. For the concept, see...''" at the top. --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 15:59, 22 September 2007 (EDT) | As per the Manual of Style, the content of this article should be about [[intelligent design]] while the current content should move (for example) to <nowiki>[[Intelligent Design (book)]]</nowiki> - any sysop opinion on this? If the answer is no, then the article should at least have a line like "''This article is about the book called Intelligent Design. For the concept, see...''" at the top. --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 15:59, 22 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | :I can't see anything in the [[Conservapedia:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]] about his, but I would otherwise agree with you. If there are no objections I will move/rename this in a couple of day's time (if I don't forget). [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 19:02, 5 November 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 00:02, November 6, 2007
Move?
As per the Manual of Style, the content of this article should be about intelligent design while the current content should move (for example) to [[Intelligent Design (book)]] - any sysop opinion on this? If the answer is no, then the article should at least have a line like "This article is about the book called Intelligent Design. For the concept, see..." at the top. --Jenkins 15:59, 22 September 2007 (EDT)
- I can't see anything in the Manual of Style about his, but I would otherwise agree with you. If there are no objections I will move/rename this in a couple of day's time (if I don't forget). Philip J. Rayment 19:02, 5 November 2007 (EST)