Difference between revisions of "User talk:Puellanivis"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Useful links
Puellanivis (talk | contribs) (Thanks, but don't be so happy... I'm simply writing supported and researched truth.) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I'm enjoying your edits. Keep up the good work. [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 12:29, 30 October 2007 (EDT) | I'm enjoying your edits. Keep up the good work. [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 12:29, 30 October 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :While I appreciate your interest in my work, my interest is not really intended to be pleasing to anyone or having anyone enjoy my edits. But rather to ensure that the information provided is correct according to the references cited. This is not about pushing a gay-rights agenda or pushing a transgender-rights agenda. It's ensuring fair and accurate representations of information, regardless of "which way" that information points, either pro-LGBT, or against LGBT. I certainly won't say on this forum "gay rights are necessary", as that is an opinion, and an opinion isn't any good on Conservapedia. Just as likely I won't say "gay rights are bad" as that is similarly an opinion. I also have no background, or research into LGB issues, only transgender issues, and more specifically transsexuality only. --[[User:Puellanivis|Puellanivis]] 16:22, 7 November 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 21:22, November 7, 2007
Welcome!
Hello, Puellanivis, and welcome to Conservapedia!
We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.
At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!
Thanks for reading, Puellanivis!
- Philip J. Rayment 20:54, 24 July 2007 (EDT)
I'm enjoying your edits. Keep up the good work. Maestro 12:29, 30 October 2007 (EDT)
- While I appreciate your interest in my work, my interest is not really intended to be pleasing to anyone or having anyone enjoy my edits. But rather to ensure that the information provided is correct according to the references cited. This is not about pushing a gay-rights agenda or pushing a transgender-rights agenda. It's ensuring fair and accurate representations of information, regardless of "which way" that information points, either pro-LGBT, or against LGBT. I certainly won't say on this forum "gay rights are necessary", as that is an opinion, and an opinion isn't any good on Conservapedia. Just as likely I won't say "gay rights are bad" as that is similarly an opinion. I also have no background, or research into LGB issues, only transgender issues, and more specifically transsexuality only. --Puellanivis 16:22, 7 November 2007 (EST)