Difference between revisions of "ASARCO Inc. v. Kadish"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Removing all content from page) |
(Undo revision 332034 by Special:Contributions/Jameson (User talk:Jameson)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | In '''''ASARCO Inc. v. Kadish''''', 490 U.S. 605 (1989), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] restated the [[Rooker-Feldman doctrine]] that 28 U. S. C. § 1257 ordinarily bars direct review in the lower federal courts of a decision reached by the highest state court, because such authority is vested solely in the [[U.S. Supreme Court]]. See: | |
| + | *''District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman'', 460 U.S. 462 (1983) | ||
| + | *''Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Locomotive Engineers'', 398 U.S. 281, 296 (1970) | ||
| + | *''Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.'', 263 U.S. 413, 415-416 (1923) | ||
| + | [[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | ||
Revision as of 02:16, November 12, 2007
In ASARCO Inc. v. Kadish, 490 U.S. 605 (1989), the U.S. Supreme Court restated the Rooker-Feldman doctrine that 28 U. S. C. § 1257 ordinarily bars direct review in the lower federal courts of a decision reached by the highest state court, because such authority is vested solely in the U.S. Supreme Court. See:
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983)
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Locomotive Engineers, 398 U.S. 281, 296 (1970)
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 415-416 (1923)