Difference between revisions of "People for the American Way"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(falsely claims to be non-partisan)
m
Line 1: Line 1:
−
'''People for the American Way''' is a left-wing advocacy group <ref>Even as PFAW holds fast to its "non-partisan" tag, the Capital Research Center reported that, in 2003 and 2004, 98 percent of the organization's political contributions went to left-liberal Democratic candidates. [http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6400] </ref> created by [[Normar Lear]] which promotes "[[diversity]]" and disparages the "radical right". <ref> [http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=22838] </ref>
+
'''People for the American Way''' is a left-wing advocacy group <ref>Even as PFAW holds fast to its "non-partisan" tag, the Capital Research Center reported that, in 2003 and 2004, 98 percent of the organization's political contributions went to left-liberal Democratic candidates. [http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6400] </ref> created by [[Norman Lear]] which promotes "[[diversity]]" and disparages the "radical right". <ref> [http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=22838] </ref>
  
 
PAW ripped [[Robert Bork]]'s reputation to shreds and slandered [[Charles Pickering]], derailing both jurists's nominations. <ref> [http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6400] </ref>
 
PAW ripped [[Robert Bork]]'s reputation to shreds and slandered [[Charles Pickering]], derailing both jurists's nominations. <ref> [http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6400] </ref>

Revision as of 19:43, November 12, 2007

People for the American Way is a left-wing advocacy group [1] created by Norman Lear which promotes "diversity" and disparages the "radical right". [2]

PAW ripped Robert Bork's reputation to shreds and slandered Charles Pickering, derailing both jurists's nominations. [3]

Notes

  1. ↑ Even as PFAW holds fast to its "non-partisan" tag, the Capital Research Center reported that, in 2003 and 2004, 98 percent of the organization's political contributions went to left-liberal Democratic candidates. [1]
  2. ↑ [2]
  3. ↑ [3]