| Line 5: |
Line 5: |
| | == Introduction == | | == Introduction == |
| | | | |
| − | The public has flexed its [[muscle]] the past few weeks. Public outrage forced [[CBS]] to withdraw from its [[network]] its [[bias]]ed [[film]] about former [[President]] [[Ronald Reagan]]. Public outrage also forced the [[Florida]] legislature to pass a special [[law]] to save the [[life]] of [[Terri Schiavo|Terri Schiavo-Schindler]]. A [[court]] had ordered her feeding tube removed based on [[statement]]s by her estranged [[husband]] that [[Terri Schiavo|Terri]] did not want to live anymore. This [[special law]] gave the feeding tube back to [[Terri Schiavo|Terri]]. | + | The public has flexed its [[muscle]] the past few weeks. Public outrage forced [[CBS]] to withdraw from its [[network]] its [[bias]]ed [[film]] about former [[President]] [[Ronald Reagan]]. Public outrage also forced the [[Florida]] legislature to pass a special [[law]] to save the [[life]] of [[Terri Schiavo|Terri Schiavo-Schindler]]. A [[court]] had ordered her feeding tube removed based on [[statement]]s by her estranged [[husband]] that [[Terri Schiavo|Terri]] did not want to live anymore. This special [[law]] gave the feeding tube back to [[Terri Schiavo|Terri]]. |
| | | | |
| − | These were not acts of [[political party|political parties]], though the [[Republican Party]] did play [[minor]] [[roles]]. This was the public [[at large]], acting through “[[interest groups]]” and as [[individual]]s, that forced [[action]]. Today we will talk about “[[interest groups]].” | + | These were not acts of [[political party|political parties]], though the [[Republican Party]] did play [[minor]] roles. This was the public at large, acting through “[[interest groups]]” and as individuals, that forced [[action]]. Today we will talk about “[[interest groups]].” |
| | | | |
| − | This past week there was also a [[tremendous]] [[achievement]] by a [[single-issue]] interest group: the signing into law of the ban on [[partial birth abortion]]s. [[National Right to Life]] and other [[pro-life]] groups have been [[work]]ing on this for nearly ten years. It takes that long when [[opposition]] is [[fierce]]. | + | This past week there was also a tremendous achievement by a single-[[issue]] [[interest group]]: the signing into [[law]] of the ban on [[partial birth abortion]]s. [[National Right to Life Committee|National Right to Life]] and other [[pro-life]] groups have been [[work]]ing on this for nearly ten years. It takes that long when opposition is fierce. |
| | | | |
| − | We also had an [[election]] last [[Tuesday]], and we will take a moment to look at the [[result]]s. | + | We also had an [[election]] last [[Tuesday]], and we will take a moment to look at the results. |
| | | | |
| | == What is an Interest Group? == | | == What is an Interest Group? == |
| Line 21: |
Line 21: |
| | The [[motivation]] for an [[interest group]] is to work with both parties towards a specific [[goal]]. It [[focus]]es on only one [[issue]], or a small [[number]] of connected [[issue]]s, and thus [[channel]]s all its [[energy]] towards that end. It is unconcerned with many other [[issue]]s affecting political parties. | | The [[motivation]] for an [[interest group]] is to work with both parties towards a specific [[goal]]. It [[focus]]es on only one [[issue]], or a small [[number]] of connected [[issue]]s, and thus [[channel]]s all its [[energy]] towards that end. It is unconcerned with many other [[issue]]s affecting political parties. |
| | | | |
| − | For example, the [[National Right to Life]] does not take a position on [[tax]]es, [[immigration]], the [[environment]], [[Social Security]], etc. When asked whether it supports the [[Equal Rights Amendment]] (ERA), it responded that it would if the [[Amendment]] were changed to make sure it did not authorize [[abortion]] or funding of [[abortion]]. That is its [[issue]], while others oppose ERA for many other [[issue]]s, too. | + | For example, the [[National Right to Life Committee|National Right to Life]] does not take a position on [[tax]]es, [[immigration]], the [[environment]], [[Social Security]], etc. When asked whether it supports the [[Equal Rights Amendment]] (ERA), it responded that it would if the [[Amendment]] were changed to make sure it did not authorize [[abortion]] or funding of [[abortion]]. That is its [[issue]], while others oppose ERA for many other [[issue]]s, too. |
| | | | |
| | Both [[Democratic]] and [[Republican]] candidates can seek the support of the [[National Rifle Association]] (NRA), which is a large and particularly [[powerful]] [[interest group]]. It sends a [[questionnaire]] to [[candidate]]s to see if they agree with [[gun rights]]. It can help [[candidate]]s become [[election|elected]] by endorsing them or raising [[campaign money]] for them. | | Both [[Democratic]] and [[Republican]] candidates can seek the support of the [[National Rifle Association]] (NRA), which is a large and particularly [[powerful]] [[interest group]]. It sends a [[questionnaire]] to [[candidate]]s to see if they agree with [[gun rights]]. It can help [[candidate]]s become [[election|elected]] by endorsing them or raising [[campaign money]] for them. |
| Line 89: |
Line 89: |
| | The [[media]] also dislike how [[interest group]]s could [[influence]] [[election]]s by running [[ad]]s just before [[voting]]. These [[ad]]s detract from the [[power]] of the media to influence the outcome of an election. The media loved McCain partly because they agreed on this issue. | | The [[media]] also dislike how [[interest group]]s could [[influence]] [[election]]s by running [[ad]]s just before [[voting]]. These [[ad]]s detract from the [[power]] of the media to influence the outcome of an election. The media loved McCain partly because they agreed on this issue. |
| | | | |
| − | [[National Right to Life]] was so upset at McCain’s attempt to [[muzzle]] [[interest group]]s that it ran ads attacking McCain in the [[New Hampshire]] presidential[[primary]] in 2000, even though McCain has a [[pro-life]] [[voting record]]. The ads [[backfire]]d, and McCain defeated Bush. | + | [[National Right to Life Committee|National Right to Life]] was so upset at McCain’s attempt to [[muzzle]] [[interest group]]s that it ran ads attacking McCain in the [[New Hampshire]] presidential[[primary]] in 2000, even though McCain has a [[pro-life]] [[voting record]]. The ads [[backfire]]d, and McCain defeated Bush. |
| | | | |
| | What do you think about the right of interest groups to run [[expensiv]] ads just before an [[election]]? Should it be limited? In the [[Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform Act]] of 2002, [[Congress]] prohibited political ads by interest groups within 60 days of an election. The [[Supreme Court]] later ruled this to be [[unconstitutional]]. Do you think this [[regulation]] is constitutional? | | What do you think about the right of interest groups to run [[expensiv]] ads just before an [[election]]? Should it be limited? In the [[Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform Act]] of 2002, [[Congress]] prohibited political ads by interest groups within 60 days of an election. The [[Supreme Court]] later ruled this to be [[unconstitutional]]. Do you think this [[regulation]] is constitutional? |