Difference between revisions of "User:MexMax/Contest3"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 54: Line 54:
  
 
==Not Yet Totaled==
 
==Not Yet Totaled==
−
2 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 4
+
2 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 2
  
 
I'm now going through articles using "random page" and zapping red links where appropriate; creating needed articles otherwise.  I've come to the conclusion that Conservapedia's articles are of good quality, and don't need that much work!
 
I'm now going through articles using "random page" and zapping red links where appropriate; creating needed articles otherwise.  I've come to the conclusion that Conservapedia's articles are of good quality, and don't need that much work!

Revision as of 01:39, November 15, 2007

My Contest Statistics:

Monday, November 12 (94 POINTS)


  • Quality edit to Republic (Politics): 4 Points
  • Will return to this theme as well as important literature & poetry later.
  • Ordinary new Accretion Disk with link from Black Hole, 6pts (ordinary+minor edit)
  • Redirect Northern Lights to Aurora Borealis, 1/2 of new entry=2 points.
  • QEdit to Northern Lights (4).
  • Bright Terrain (new, 6)
  • Doppler Effect (minor edit, 2)
  • Stellar Classifications (new, 6)
  • Synchronous Rotation (new, 6)
  • Penumbra (new, 6)
  • Sunspot (new, 6)
  • Photosphere (new, 6)
  • Redirect of Facula to Sunspot, 2 points, adding info on it to Sunspot, 2 points (4) (54 thus far)
  • Poetic meter (new, 10)
  • Iambic pentameter (new, 10)
  • Iamb (new, 6)
  • Philip II (most wanted, 4+3=7)
  • Gilead (stub, most wanted, 4+3=7)

Tuesday, November 13 (78)

Ordinary new articles from US Govt' Source (6pts each): 13 so far.

Wednesday, November 14 (92 as of 12:36 EST)

  • Short most-wanted articles (4+3=7 each): 6
  • Medium most-wanted articles (6+3=9 each): 2
  • Long most-wanted articles (10+3=13 each): 2
  • Medium regular articles (6): 1


Thursday, November 15



Friday, November 16



Saturday, November 17



Sunday, November 18



TOTAL POINTS:


Not Yet Totaled

2 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 2

I'm now going through articles using "random page" and zapping red links where appropriate; creating needed articles otherwise. I've come to the conclusion that Conservapedia's articles are of good quality, and don't need that much work!