Difference between revisions of "Intolerance"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(edit, remove liberal bias.)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:Criticism-of-Religion.jpg|thumb|Criticism of Religions is Not Free Speech]]
 
 
'''Intolerance''' (opposite of [[tolerance]]) is a refusal to allow other people to express their opinions or to practice their religion.  
 
'''Intolerance''' (opposite of [[tolerance]]) is a refusal to allow other people to express their opinions or to practice their religion.  
 
In [[totalitarian]] countries, the government forcibly suppresses all views which oppose government policy or ideology.
 
[[Communist]] countries deny the [[freedom of religion]] as well.
 
Other forms of [[dictatorship]]s permit religious freedom, but are intolerant of any criticism of the government.
 
  
 
Intolerance is also a root of some "[[hate speech]]" rules and laws. Various special interest groups have gotten companies, schools and governments to define any criticism of their group activities as "motivated by hate".  Corretta Scott King views  homosexual activity the same as an opinion or the practice of religion as the following quote illustrates:
 
Intolerance is also a root of some "[[hate speech]]" rules and laws. Various special interest groups have gotten companies, schools and governments to define any criticism of their group activities as "motivated by hate".  Corretta Scott King views  homosexual activity the same as an opinion or the practice of religion as the following quote illustrates:
Line 10: Line 5:
 
*"[[Homophobia]] is like [[racism]] and [[anti-Semitism]] and other forms of [[bigotry]] in that it seeks to dehumanize a large group of people, to deny their humanity, their dignity and personhood." <ref> [http://www.equal-marriage.ca/resource.php?id=317 Coretta Scott King, 1998] </ref>
 
*"[[Homophobia]] is like [[racism]] and [[anti-Semitism]] and other forms of [[bigotry]] in that it seeks to dehumanize a large group of people, to deny their humanity, their dignity and personhood." <ref> [http://www.equal-marriage.ca/resource.php?id=317 Coretta Scott King, 1998] </ref>
  
The error in this argument is obvious. Telling someone about a warning in the Bible is doing them a favor, not expressing hatred toward them. When a teacher instructs a pupil not to steal from others, not to assault them or tease them, these instructions are for the child's benefit. Similarly, informing homosexuals of the supposed sin they are committing is one sides freedom of speech - a homosexual reacting by insulting ones religious beliefs is his/her side's freedom of speech. Freedom of speech works both ways.
+
The error in this argument is obvious. ''Telling someone about a warning in the Bible is doing them a favor, not expressing hatred toward them.'' When a teacher instructs a pupil not to steal from others, not to assault them or tease them, these instructions are for the child's benefit. Similarly, informing homosexuals of the sin they are committing is one sides freedom of speech - a homosexual reacting by insulting ones religious beliefs is his/her side's freedom of speech, but is also telling of their intolerance by resorting to insults.
  
 
== External links ==
 
== External links ==

Revision as of 03:27, November 16, 2007

Intolerance (opposite of tolerance) is a refusal to allow other people to express their opinions or to practice their religion.

Intolerance is also a root of some "hate speech" rules and laws. Various special interest groups have gotten companies, schools and governments to define any criticism of their group activities as "motivated by hate". Corretta Scott King views homosexual activity the same as an opinion or the practice of religion as the following quote illustrates:

The error in this argument is obvious. Telling someone about a warning in the Bible is doing them a favor, not expressing hatred toward them. When a teacher instructs a pupil not to steal from others, not to assault them or tease them, these instructions are for the child's benefit. Similarly, informing homosexuals of the sin they are committing is one sides freedom of speech - a homosexual reacting by insulting ones religious beliefs is his/her side's freedom of speech, but is also telling of their intolerance by resorting to insults.

External links

References