Difference between revisions of "User talk:Cranky Joe"
Cranky Joe (talk | contribs) |
Realitycheck (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::Sorry, I thought this was a wiki for promoting conservative agenda, not one for "facts". Well, scientists will tell you that a round earth and the theory of evolution are "facts". I do not think that I have vandalized anything, nor put inapropriate or obscene content here. If I come across as a bit brash, it's just my nature; I do not mean to offend. We are, after all, all Christian brothers. --[[User:Cranky Joe|Cranky Joe]] 00:18, 14 March 2007 (EDT) | ::Sorry, I thought this was a wiki for promoting conservative agenda, not one for "facts". Well, scientists will tell you that a round earth and the theory of evolution are "facts". I do not think that I have vandalized anything, nor put inapropriate or obscene content here. If I come across as a bit brash, it's just my nature; I do not mean to offend. We are, after all, all Christian brothers. --[[User:Cranky Joe|Cranky Joe]] 00:18, 14 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: [[User:Cranky Joe|Cranky Joe]]'s free speech seems limited to his user page, which I believe is not against the rules. "6. Do not post personal opinion on an encyclopedia entry. Opinions can be posted on Talk:pages or on debate or discussion pages." Is it just me or has he done nothing wrong? I certainly don't believe so as his user page is not an encyclopedia entry and accurately portrays his views so that others may clearly understand his perspective. | ||
Revision as of 04:21, March 14, 2007
I think you might want to take some of the more... opinionated stuff off of your userpage... it's blatantly offensive for no reason. --Hojimachongtalk
Cranky Joe, your page sounded like a liberal's caricature of conservatives. I hope I'm wrong and, if so, welcome. But if I'm right, be sure to look at the statutes at the top of the Main_Page before you make edits here. Thanks.--Aschlafly 00:05, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
I take offense at that. Just because I'm not one of today's idealistic "moderates" or "bipartisans" you hear about in the liberal media doesn't mean that I'm not %110 purebread genuine conservative, and my rights to free speech will not be supressed just because some find me too "radical". --Cranky Joe 00:10, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
Besides, I even wrote a article: Apple pie. --Cranky Joe 00:10, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
- Abide by our rules, please. Free speech here is limited by those rules. Thank you.--Aschlafly 00:13, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
- Sorry, I thought this was a wiki for promoting conservative agenda, not one for "facts". Well, scientists will tell you that a round earth and the theory of evolution are "facts". I do not think that I have vandalized anything, nor put inapropriate or obscene content here. If I come across as a bit brash, it's just my nature; I do not mean to offend. We are, after all, all Christian brothers. --Cranky Joe 00:18, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
- Cranky Joe's free speech seems limited to his user page, which I believe is not against the rules. "6. Do not post personal opinion on an encyclopedia entry. Opinions can be posted on Talk:pages or on debate or discussion pages." Is it just me or has he done nothing wrong? I certainly don't believe so as his user page is not an encyclopedia entry and accurately portrays his views so that others may clearly understand his perspective.