nsAm_Govt_101_ta
862
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − + Line 16:
Line 16: + + + + + − + + + + + + + + − ==Wednesday, November 14== − + − + + + + − + + + + − Line 43:
Line 59: + + + + +
User:MexMax/Contest3 (view source)
Revision as of 23:17, November 16, 2007
, 23:17, November 16, 2007→Friday, November 16
'''[[User:MexMax|My]] [[Contest3|Contest]] Statistics:'''
'''[[User:MexMax|My]] [[Contest3|Contest]] Statistics:'''
==Monday, November 12==
==Monday, November 12 (94 POINTS)==
<br />
<br />
*Quality edit to [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Republic_%28Politics%29&diff=332384&oldid=293988 Republic (Politics)]: 4 Points
*Quality edit to [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Republic_%28Politics%29&diff=332384&oldid=293988 Republic (Politics)]: 4 Points
*Photosphere (new, 6)
*Photosphere (new, 6)
*Redirect of Facula to Sunspot, 2 points, adding info on it to Sunspot, 2 points (4) (54 thus far)
*Redirect of Facula to Sunspot, 2 points, adding info on it to Sunspot, 2 points (4) (54 thus far)
*Poetic meter (new, 10)
*Iambic pentameter (new, 10)
*Iamb (new, 6)
*Philip II (most wanted, 4+3=7)
*Gilead (stub, most wanted, 4+3=7)
==Tuesday, November 13==
==Tuesday, November 13 (78)==
Ordinary new articles from US Govt' Source (6pts each): 13 so far.
<br />
<br />
==Wednesday, November 14 (124 as of 12:36 EST)==
*Short most-wanted articles (4+3=7 each): 6
*Medium most-wanted articles (6+3=9 each): 2
*Long most-wanted articles (10+3=13 each): 2
*Medium regular articles (6): 1
*32 from random business.
<br />
<br />
==Thursday, November 15 (153 and still going!)==
==Thursday, November 15==
*Minor edits (2p):
*Major edits (4p):
*Short wanted page (7p):
*Short page (4p):
<br />
<br />
==Friday, November 16==
==Friday, November 16==
*Minor edits (2p): III
*Major edits (4p): I
*Short wanted page (7p):
*Short page (4p):
<br />
<br />
==Saturday, November 17==
==Saturday, November 17==
==TOTAL POINTS:==
==TOTAL POINTS:==
<br />
<br />
==Not Yet Totaled==
(32 added above the line)
I'm now going through articles using "random page" and zapping red links where appropriate; creating needed articles otherwise. I've come to the conclusion that Conservapedia's articles are of good quality, and don't need that much work!