Ordinary new articles from US Govt' Source (6pts each): 13 so far.
<br />
<br />
+
==Wednesday, November 14 (124 as of 12:36 EST)==
+
*Short most-wanted articles (4+3=7 each): 6
+
*Medium most-wanted articles (6+3=9 each): 2
+
*Long most-wanted articles (10+3=13 each): 2
+
*Medium regular articles (6): 1
+
*32 from random business.
−
==Wednesday, November 14==
<br />
<br />
−
+
==Thursday, November 15 (153 and still going!)==
−
==Thursday, November 15==
+
*Minor edits (2p):
+
*Major edits (4p):
+
*Short wanted page (7p):
+
*Short page (4p):
<br />
<br />
−
==Friday, November 16==
==Friday, November 16==
+
*Minor edits (2p): III
+
*Major edits (4p): I
+
*Short wanted page (7p):
+
*Short page (4p):
<br />
<br />
−
==Saturday, November 17==
==Saturday, November 17==
Line 48:
Line 59:
==TOTAL POINTS:==
==TOTAL POINTS:==
<br />
<br />
+
+
==Not Yet Totaled==
+
(32 added above the line)
+
+
I'm now going through articles using "random page" and zapping red links where appropriate; creating needed articles otherwise. I've come to the conclusion that Conservapedia's articles are of good quality, and don't need that much work!