| Line 22: |
Line 22: |
| | *Gilead (stub, most wanted, 4+3=7) | | *Gilead (stub, most wanted, 4+3=7) |
| | | | |
| − | ==Tuesday, November 13 (12 so far)== | + | ==Tuesday, November 13 (78)== |
| − | Ordinary new articles from US Govt' Source (6pts each): 2 so far. | + | Ordinary new articles from US Govt' Source (6pts each): 13 so far. |
| | <br /> | | <br /> |
| | | | |
| − | ==Wednesday, November 14== | + | ==Wednesday, November 14 (124 as of 12:36 EST)== |
| | + | *Short most-wanted articles (4+3=7 each): 6 |
| | + | *Medium most-wanted articles (6+3=9 each): 2 |
| | + | *Long most-wanted articles (10+3=13 each): 2 |
| | + | *Medium regular articles (6): 1 |
| | + | *32 from random business. |
| | + | |
| | <br /> | | <br /> |
| | | | |
| − | | + | ==Thursday, November 15 (153 and still going!)== |
| − | ==Thursday, November 15== | + | *Minor edits (2p): |
| | + | *Major edits (4p): |
| | + | *Short wanted page (7p): |
| | + | *Short page (4p): |
| | <br /> | | <br /> |
| − |
| |
| | | | |
| | ==Friday, November 16== | | ==Friday, November 16== |
| | + | *Minor edits (2p): III |
| | + | *Major edits (4p): I |
| | + | *Short wanted page (7p): |
| | + | *Short page (4p): |
| | <br /> | | <br /> |
| − |
| |
| | | | |
| | ==Saturday, November 17== | | ==Saturday, November 17== |
| Line 48: |
Line 59: |
| | ==TOTAL POINTS:== | | ==TOTAL POINTS:== |
| | <br /> | | <br /> |
| | + | |
| | + | ==Not Yet Totaled== |
| | + | (32 added above the line) |
| | + | |
| | + | I'm now going through articles using "random page" and zapping red links where appropriate; creating needed articles otherwise. I've come to the conclusion that Conservapedia's articles are of good quality, and don't need that much work! |