Difference between revisions of "User talk:Sjohnson"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Lukecorlando (talk | contribs) (New page: Your comment on the abortion talk page is not proven as you wish the article to be. You're just a spineless,factless liberal with no evidence to support your assertion. What exactly is wro...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Your comment on the abortion talk page is not proven as you wish the article to be. You're just a spineless,factless liberal with no evidence to support your assertion. What exactly is wrong with the article about abortion? [[User:Lukecorlando|Luke]] 20:28, 18 November 2007 (EST) | Your comment on the abortion talk page is not proven as you wish the article to be. You're just a spineless,factless liberal with no evidence to support your assertion. What exactly is wrong with the article about abortion? [[User:Lukecorlando|Luke]] 20:28, 18 November 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | For starters, a fetus, especially in its early stages is merely a coagulation of cells. The constant referring to it as a human is ridiculous. Also, abortion has been proven to be a constitutional right by Roe v. Wade. Stop living in the past and accept that we live in changing times. [[User:Sjohnson|Sjohnson]] 20:32, 18 November 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 01:32, November 19, 2007
Your comment on the abortion talk page is not proven as you wish the article to be. You're just a spineless,factless liberal with no evidence to support your assertion. What exactly is wrong with the article about abortion? Luke 20:28, 18 November 2007 (EST)
For starters, a fetus, especially in its early stages is merely a coagulation of cells. The constant referring to it as a human is ridiculous. Also, abortion has been proven to be a constitutional right by Roe v. Wade. Stop living in the past and accept that we live in changing times. Sjohnson 20:32, 18 November 2007 (EST)