Difference between revisions of "Talk:Intelligent Design (book)"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Move?: Agree)
m (Talk:Intelligent Design moved to Talk:Intelligent Design (book): To distinguish from the proper ID article)
(No difference)

Revision as of 01:33, November 20, 2007

Move?

As per the Manual of Style, the content of this article should be about intelligent design while the current content should move (for example) to [[Intelligent Design (book)]] - any sysop opinion on this? If the answer is no, then the article should at least have a line like "This article is about the book called Intelligent Design. For the concept, see..." at the top. --Jenkins 15:59, 22 September 2007 (EDT)

I can't see anything in the Manual of Style about his, but I would otherwise agree with you. If there are no objections I will move/rename this in a couple of day's time (if I don't forget). Philip J. Rayment 19:02, 5 November 2007 (EST)