Changes

1,018 bytes added ,  00:59, November 21, 2007
no edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:     
:We were in the middle of a Contest, but even we were in normal times it is too much work for a Sysop to read every word of every comment. Your comment '''was NOT''' clear enough. Also, I find your reply lack of kindness. Could it change?  --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 18:43, 20 November 2007 (EST)
 
:We were in the middle of a Contest, but even we were in normal times it is too much work for a Sysop to read every word of every comment. Your comment '''was NOT''' clear enough. Also, I find your reply lack of kindness. Could it change?  --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 18:43, 20 November 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
Well now, this is going from bad to worse.  Your attitude is making me wonder why I even pointed out the error of the Gettysburg article in the first place.  I would appreciate it if you would just let this matter drop, because face it, you made a mistake.
 +
 +
The comment I made was short and to the point.  The founder of this website understood what I was talking about and thanked me for my efforts.  If you have a problem with spending two seconds to read the 20+ words I wrote, then maybe you should reevaluate your way of conducting your role as an editor.
 +
 +
As for my alleged lack of kindness, you are the one that said I should “take a better look” even though you failed to take ten seconds to point, click, and read the history of the Gettysburg article.  Doesn’t that sound hypocritical?  It is the carelessness on your part that has resulted in this meaningless exchange.  Is this what I am to expect from the majority of sysops on this website?  I hope not.  --Jimmy 19:59, 20 November 2007 (EST)
300

edits