Difference between revisions of "Circular argument"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(uses its conclusion as a premise)
(No difference)

Revision as of 14:35, November 22, 2007

A circular argument is one which uses its conclusion as a premise. This creates a dependency loop which (like a circle) has no beginning or end.

It is considered invalid and therefore is not permitted by the rules of formal logic.