Difference between revisions of "Talk:18 USC § 1470"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
: Your wrong. 18 USC 1470 is applied to the internet, and whether the website is "free-use" or not is irrelevant.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:46, 14 March 2007 (EDT) | : Your wrong. 18 USC 1470 is applied to the internet, and whether the website is "free-use" or not is irrelevant.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:46, 14 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| − | The internet is not American, by the way. Isn't there a jurisdictional issue here when applying this law to people who know how to spell aluminium? | + | The internet is not American, by the way. Isn't there a jurisdictional issue here when applying this law to people who know how to spell aluminium? (And by the way, Aschafly, someone like you who's trying to write an encyclopedia should know to write "you're" - not "your". --[[User:Offaxis|Offaxis]] |
Revision as of 08:53, March 14, 2007
There's some fun Commerce Clause jurisprudence on this statute, isn't there, I think one of the parties is X-Citement Video, but I can't find it in my briefs...--AmesG 23:37, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
Obscene material is not profanity
It refers to using mail to send X-rated materials to minors, not posting bad words on a free-use website.
- Your wrong. 18 USC 1470 is applied to the internet, and whether the website is "free-use" or not is irrelevant.--Aschlafly 00:46, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
The internet is not American, by the way. Isn't there a jurisdictional issue here when applying this law to people who know how to spell aluminium? (And by the way, Aschafly, someone like you who's trying to write an encyclopedia should know to write "you're" - not "your". --Offaxis