Difference between revisions of "Talk:Third rail"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Grammar: unsigned and reply)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
I believe that the grammar was already correct, and that Joaquín Martínez's change made it incorrect.  Please explain why I am wrong.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 18:26, 23 November 2007 (EST)
 
I believe that the grammar was already correct, and that Joaquín Martínez's change made it incorrect.  Please explain why I am wrong.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 18:26, 23 November 2007 (EST)
  
−
 
+
The first sentence is far and away the worst sentence i have ever read. {{unsigned|Ezekiel1310}}
−
The first sentence is far and away the worst sentence i have ever read.
+
:Aw, come on, it's not ''that'' bad, is it?  How would you propose that it should read?  Please just rewrite it if you can do better.  We can always revert if we really disagree. :-) [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 18:49, 23 November 2007 (EST)

Latest revision as of 23:49, November 23, 2007

Grammar

I believe that the grammar was already correct, and that Joaquín Martínez's change made it incorrect. Please explain why I am wrong. Philip J. Rayment 18:26, 23 November 2007 (EST)

The first sentence is far and away the worst sentence i have ever read. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ezekiel1310 (talk)

Aw, come on, it's not that bad, is it? How would you propose that it should read? Please just rewrite it if you can do better. We can always revert if we really disagree. :-) Philip J. Rayment 18:49, 23 November 2007 (EST)