nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
675
edits
Changes
→Challenges
::: Superb suggestions, Joaquin!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:54, 23 November 2007 (EST)
::: Superb suggestions, Joaquin!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:54, 23 November 2007 (EST)
::Again, if User:BrianCo 's edits aren't valid, then neither should any points for linking within the American Government lectures by any contributor. BrianCo acted within the bounds of the rules and scored himself accurately for the linking. Andy, your team lost the contest plain and simple. You had members who made no contributions whatsoever, and it's unfortunate that you're trying to take points away from people who earned them honestly just to win at any cost. [[User:SSchultz|SSchultz]] 13:59, 24 November 2007 (EST)
*Point total suggestion: in addition to Joaquin's suggestion, I propose that a quality edit to the Main page be worth 10 points, an ordinary edit be worth 6 points, and a minor edit (such as statistics or a correction) be worth 3 points.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:25, 23 November 2007 (EST)
*Point total suggestion: in addition to Joaquin's suggestion, I propose that a quality edit to the Main page be worth 10 points, an ordinary edit be worth 6 points, and a minor edit (such as statistics or a correction) be worth 3 points.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:25, 23 November 2007 (EST)