Difference between revisions of "User talk:PaulH"
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Oops, you're right. Please accept my apologies. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 00:32, 28 November 2007 (EST) | Oops, you're right. Please accept my apologies. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 00:32, 28 November 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Good work. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 08:40, 28 November 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 13:40, November 28, 2007
Your edits are interesting. Welcome!
I need to shut down editing soon tonight. Will reopen for editing early tomorrow (Wednesday) morning. Please feel free to create entries offline to enter when general editing is reopened. Thanks.--Aschlafly 00:23, 28 November 2007 (EST)
Please use talk pages before mass removing information from articles. If you persist, you may be blocked. Thank you. DanH 00:24, 28 November 2007 (EST)
You removed an entire paragraph, which said:
Combined with hate speech rules and hate crime laws, a government certification of "same-sex marriage" will place tremendous pressure on people who criticize homosexuality. "How do you know we're not married?" would be the simplest of rejoinders. Or, "How dare you criticize my spouse!" (see fighting words).
Such laws will open up a new wave of militant homosexual violence. Just as "He insulted my wife" can be used as defense against an assault charge.
Attempts to refer to civil unions as "marriage", or to require people who disagree with homosexuality to honor such unions. DanH 00:28, 28 November 2007 (EST)
Oops, you're right. Please accept my apologies. DanH 00:32, 28 November 2007 (EST)
- Good work. --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 08:40, 28 November 2007 (EST)