Difference between revisions of "Talk:Human reproduction"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(sean coleman)
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
I notice there is a distinct lack of reproductive organs in this wiki. I don't understand, surely conservatives can describe them in a clinical, objective manner without exploding with passion? There are conservative gynecologists, aren't there? --[[User:Afi|Afi]] 18:22, 17 July 2007 (EDT)
 
I notice there is a distinct lack of reproductive organs in this wiki. I don't understand, surely conservatives can describe them in a clinical, objective manner without exploding with passion? There are conservative gynecologists, aren't there? --[[User:Afi|Afi]] 18:22, 17 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== sean coleman ==
 +
 +
massive penis reproducts very well. also has sex with nuala

Revision as of 14:24, December 4, 2007

Blimey, this was an ommision. Requires expansion and illustration.

Let's work on this behind the scenes and try to come up with something suitable for all ages.
Draft is here. --Ed Poor 16:14, 21 April 2007 (EDT)

I note that X is also missing. This should be a priority I feel, as this could be a valuable source of information with integrity for vulnerable youth looking for answers. --stevendavy 16:23, 21 April 2007 (EDT)

Where did "X" come from? I wrote penis, which is surely not going to warp anyones mind. We need to write about the penis and the vagina. There is nothing crude in these things.stevendavy (EDT)

I notice there is a distinct lack of reproductive organs in this wiki. I don't understand, surely conservatives can describe them in a clinical, objective manner without exploding with passion? There are conservative gynecologists, aren't there? --Afi 18:22, 17 July 2007 (EDT)

sean coleman

massive penis reproducts very well. also has sex with nuala