Difference between revisions of "User talk:RSchlafly"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Gospel of Thomas) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== Gospel of Thomas == | == Gospel of Thomas == | ||
| − | It is true that the Gospel of Thomas is not part of the Bible, and not recognized outside the Coptic Christian church; I simply wanted to clarify that it nevertheless is a valuable source of information about early Christian beliefs, and that many Christians today do find great value in it. | + | It is true that the [[Gospel of Thomas]] is not part of the Bible, and not recognized outside the Coptic Christian church; I simply wanted to clarify that it nevertheless is a valuable source of information about early Christian beliefs, and that many Christians today do find great value in it. |
[[User:Boethius|Boethius]] 15:33, 14 March 2007 (EDT) | [[User:Boethius|Boethius]] 15:33, 14 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:33, March 14, 2007
good edit to Einstein article.--Aschlafly 00:14, 9 March 2007 (EST)
Thanks Roger. Whatever I can do to help, let me know. Are there any plans for coordinated projects similiar to like they have over in, you know, that other place? RobS 12:48, 9 March 2007 (EST)
Review
Roger, here's some material you may wish to review regarding "expansion of due process", [1]
- it can be argued that the legislative intent of the Amendment was especially to grow with the times, which it certainly has done. RobS 11:37, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
Gospel of Thomas
It is true that the Gospel of Thomas is not part of the Bible, and not recognized outside the Coptic Christian church; I simply wanted to clarify that it nevertheless is a valuable source of information about early Christian beliefs, and that many Christians today do find great value in it.
Boethius 15:33, 14 March 2007 (EDT)