Difference between revisions of "Talk:International Business Machines"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I clarified the IBM - Lenovo deal a bit as the information there was sparse and incomplete. I did a little more research about IBM's Linux advocacy and filled it out with references. I also added information about IBM's OS/2 operating system and its' current status as a third party product called eComStation. --[[User:Eracc|Gene]] 16:25, 20 December 2007 (EST) | I clarified the IBM - Lenovo deal a bit as the information there was sparse and incomplete. I did a little more research about IBM's Linux advocacy and filled it out with references. I also added information about IBM's OS/2 operating system and its' current status as a third party product called eComStation. --[[User:Eracc|Gene]] 16:25, 20 December 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yet a bit more cleanup and clarification. --[[User:Eracc|Gene]] 16:32, 20 December 2007 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:32, December 20, 2007
Changes
I fixed some typographical errors, made a clarification and added the fact that IBM is a strong Linux advocate. --Gene 15:54, 20 December 2007 (EST)
I clarified the IBM - Lenovo deal a bit as the information there was sparse and incomplete. I did a little more research about IBM's Linux advocacy and filled it out with references. I also added information about IBM's OS/2 operating system and its' current status as a third party product called eComStation. --Gene 16:25, 20 December 2007 (EST)
Yet a bit more cleanup and clarification. --Gene 16:32, 20 December 2007 (EST)