Difference between revisions of "Talk:Natural science"
(For extra kicks) |
Mailmejose (talk | contribs) (kidding right?) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:For extra kicks: [http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Search?search=Apologia+Educational+Ministries&fulltext=Search How often Apologie Educational Ministries are used as reference] ;) I only made that search after a few blogs pointed it out. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 19:01, 11 March 2007 (EDT) | :For extra kicks: [http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Search?search=Apologia+Educational+Ministries&fulltext=Search How often Apologie Educational Ministries are used as reference] ;) I only made that search after a few blogs pointed it out. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 19:01, 11 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == kidding right? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Conservatives referencing science! This is like a construction company trying to build a modern building with a primitive hammer and wooden rivets, consulting from architectural plans interpreted through Aramaic, Greek, Latin and then English of whose origins you do not know and whose different pages contradict themselves. Personally I would much rather trust information that was obtained using only the soundest of scientific methods that was many times over peer reviewed and tested many times over accounting for as many variables as possible. Don't trust this method? You already do when you fly in a plane or drive your car (thermodynamics, aerodynamics, chemistry, metallurgy, physics, etc.) For peer reviewed information go back to school or consult wikepedia. For amusement, browse your heart away here! | ||
Revision as of 20:26, March 14, 2007
Irony
Isn't it it sort of ironic to reference a creationist on the 'science' page?
- For extra kicks: How often Apologie Educational Ministries are used as reference ;) I only made that search after a few blogs pointed it out. --Sid 3050 19:01, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
kidding right?
Conservatives referencing science! This is like a construction company trying to build a modern building with a primitive hammer and wooden rivets, consulting from architectural plans interpreted through Aramaic, Greek, Latin and then English of whose origins you do not know and whose different pages contradict themselves. Personally I would much rather trust information that was obtained using only the soundest of scientific methods that was many times over peer reviewed and tested many times over accounting for as many variables as possible. Don't trust this method? You already do when you fly in a plane or drive your car (thermodynamics, aerodynamics, chemistry, metallurgy, physics, etc.) For peer reviewed information go back to school or consult wikepedia. For amusement, browse your heart away here!