Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Rand"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(that doesn't answer my question.)
(TemplateDoc required)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
:Rand is allways a usefull function to have, I was suprised that MediaWiki does not come with a rand function built in. {{unsigned|Klein}}
 
:Rand is allways a usefull function to have, I was suprised that MediaWiki does not come with a rand function built in. {{unsigned|Klein}}
 
::That doesn't answer my question. What purpose does it serve? [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:38, 23 December 2007 (EST)
 
::That doesn't answer my question. What purpose does it serve? [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:38, 23 December 2007 (EST)
 +
::: The template does not have the {{tl|TemplateDoc}} template as part of the documentation as is required.  Providing that ''might'' provide an answer to Dan's question.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 00:42, 24 December 2007 (EST)

Latest revision as of 05:42, December 24, 2007

What is the purpose of this template? DanH 16:38, 23 December 2007 (EST)

Rand is allways a usefull function to have, I was suprised that MediaWiki does not come with a rand function built in. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Klein (talk)
That doesn't answer my question. What purpose does it serve? DanH 23:38, 23 December 2007 (EST)
The template does not have the {{TemplateDoc}} template as part of the documentation as is required. Providing that might provide an answer to Dan's question. Philip J. Rayment 00:42, 24 December 2007 (EST)