Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:Abuse"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | ==Someone else look at [[User: | + | ==Someone else look at [[User:RightWolf2]], [[Talk:Wikipedia]], [[Wikipedia]], please== |
I'm not objective because I've been editing the article myself. It seems to ''me'' that [[User:RightWolf2]] has the impression that unsupported opinion is OK as long as it's ''conservative'' opinion, and is at least near the borderline of Conservapedia Commandment #6. It particularly bothers me that, in order to support the statement that | I'm not objective because I've been editing the article myself. It seems to ''me'' that [[User:RightWolf2]] has the impression that unsupported opinion is OK as long as it's ''conservative'' opinion, and is at least near the borderline of Conservapedia Commandment #6. It particularly bothers me that, in order to support the statement that | ||
:"[Wikipedia's] Mediation Committee, Arbitration Committee, and number of site adminitrators contain a disproportionate number of homosexual members in comparison to demographic percentages within the Wikipedia Community." | :"[Wikipedia's] Mediation Committee, Arbitration Committee, and number of site adminitrators contain a disproportionate number of homosexual members in comparison to demographic percentages within the Wikipedia Community." | ||
he cites http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/ although the link page contains neither the word "homosexual" nor the word "gay." Perhaps there is relevant material on that site, but it's his job to find it and cite it, not to keep reinserting a link to this site's home page. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 16:58, 14 March 2007 (EDT) | he cites http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/ although the link page contains neither the word "homosexual" nor the word "gay." Perhaps there is relevant material on that site, but it's his job to find it and cite it, not to keep reinserting a link to this site's home page. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 16:58, 14 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:58, March 14, 2007
Someone else look at User:RightWolf2, Talk:Wikipedia, Wikipedia, please
I'm not objective because I've been editing the article myself. It seems to me that User:RightWolf2 has the impression that unsupported opinion is OK as long as it's conservative opinion, and is at least near the borderline of Conservapedia Commandment #6. It particularly bothers me that, in order to support the statement that
- "[Wikipedia's] Mediation Committee, Arbitration Committee, and number of site adminitrators contain a disproportionate number of homosexual members in comparison to demographic percentages within the Wikipedia Community."
he cites http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/ although the link page contains neither the word "homosexual" nor the word "gay." Perhaps there is relevant material on that site, but it's his job to find it and cite it, not to keep reinserting a link to this site's home page. Dpbsmith 16:58, 14 March 2007 (EDT)